The article about %%Keyword%%, which is currently a popular topic of Books, Is commanding substantial observance, isn’t it? Today, let’s explore some What’s in a name? That which we call “Smut” that you may not know about in this article on Camille Di Maio!

The article is evaluated What’s in a name? That which we call “Smut”

Just last week (at least by the time I’m writing this post — it might come up a little later) I finished my Smutathon readathon… and like last time it was a lot of fun (it’s the second time I did this ) but it also reminded me of the controversy surrounding the word Smut

It’s funny how it almost seems like a derogatory term for romance novels… and it’s not only used by the snobbish romance haters but even among ourselves hardcore romance readers… But let’s get down to basics…

Definition of Smut

“A story, usually a book or a fan fiction, that includes one or more sexually explicit scenes.”

That’s it… it’s just a book with explicit sex in it. A lot of romance books have sex in them (some more explicit than others), so calling them smutty books should not be offensive, but why does it feel like it is … Why do we add that connotation to a mere descriptive word…

I find it funny how some of the bloggers and booktubers I follow completely avoid the word, or on the contrary, they will give you a lecture on what exactly a smutty book is… most times making the connection to the Erotica side of the spectrum and I get that, not all romance books are “smutty books” after all.. but let’s not forget that we are talking about sexual content in books and there are degrees to that.. levels of explicitness sort of speak, so I might be using the word smut correctly if I’m referring to a book even if it’s not an Erotica Novel..

Which brings me to another tangent… I could be reading a sci/fi book without romance in it… that maybe talks about alien reproduction or something like that and it uses explicit sex to explain it… So, in this case, I’m sure people would avoid using the word smut, but it would still be accurate, wouldn’t it? Calling it a sci/fi smutty book..

It upsets me how we turn one simple word or expression into the enemy… I recall the hated (I do hate this with a passion) “Mommy Porn” back when Fifty Shades was a huge thing… What?? Everyone and their dog read those books. Why is it called Mommy Porn? What the heck? It was just another way to demean the romance genre… just like this ridiculous thing with the word smut…

So, why not take back the word despite its underlying notions of  darkness and its   metaphorical use of “indecent or obscene”… After all, what’s considered smut is in the eye of the beholder, like most things in the realm of entertainment.. And once again, we shouldn’t feel wrong about enjoying sexy smexxy books… what’s the harm in that? It doesn’t make them any less good or even relevant to have sexual content..

Okay.. ranting discussion over, more or less, but now I’m curious … what’s your stand on the use of the word Smut?? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below…